Forests and wetlands are Earth's most powerful carbon sinks, absorbing billions of tonnes of CO₂ yearly. But as deforestation and wetland loss accelerate, these natural climate defenders are disappearing. Discover how these ecosystems combat climate change and why restoring them is crucial for our future.
Written by Warrence Oghenevwegba
Published on: March 7, 2025, 10:10 P.M
Imagine a world without forests or wetlands. The air would be thick with carbon dioxide, the climate more erratic, and biodiversity would collapse. These natural landscapes do more than provide breathtaking scenery—they are among our planet’s most powerful tools against climate change.
But how exactly do they work? And why are they disappearing at an alarming rate?
Forests are often called the lungs of the planet—and for good reason. Through photosynthesis, trees absorb carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air and convert it into oxygen while storing carbon in their trunks, branches, roots, and soil. This process removes nearly 2.6 billion tonnes of CO₂ every year—roughly a third of the carbon emissions produced by fossil fuels.
However, when trees are cut down or burned, all that stored carbon is released back into the atmosphere, increasing global temperatures. The Amazon Rainforest, one of the largest carbon sinks on Earth, is now under severe threat. Studies show that deforestation and rising temperatures are pushing it toward a tipping point where it could switch from being a carbon sink to a carbon source.
This isn’t just a problem for the Amazon. Across the globe, forests are being cleared for agriculture, urban expansion, and logging. In 2022 alone, we lost an area of tropical forest the size of Switzerland. The consequences are dire—not just for carbon storage but also for biodiversity, water regulation, and soil health.
Forests don’t just trap carbon; they provide a host of other environmental benefits, including:
Forests are home to 80% of the world’s terrestrial species, including tigers, elephants, and countless birds and insects.
Trees absorb and release water, influencing rainfall patterns and reducing the risk of droughts and floods.
Forests prevent erosion, keeping soil fertile and reducing the likelihood of landslides.
But while forests get much of the attention in climate discussions, another unsung hero plays an equally vital role—wetlands.
While forests are often recognized as carbon sinks, wetlands—including peatlands, mangroves, and marshes—are even more efficient at carbon storage. Despite covering only 6% of the Earth's land area, wetlands store 20-30% of the planet’s soil carbon.
Peatlands, found in places like Canada, Russia, and Indonesia, are among the most effective carbon sinks on Earth. Though they cover only 3% of global land, they hold twice as much carbon as all the world’s forests combined.
However, they are incredibly vulnerable. When drained for agriculture or development, peatlands release massive amounts of carbon. Indonesia, for instance, emits around 1.9 gigatonnes of CO₂ annually from degraded peatlands—more than Japan’s total annual emissions.
Mangrove forests, found along tropical coastlines, absorb carbon up to 55 times faster than rainforests. Their dense root systems trap carbon-rich sediment, preventing it from re-entering the atmosphere.
Despite their importance, 35% of the world’s mangroves have been lost in the past 50 years, primarily due to coastal development, aquaculture, and pollution. When mangroves are destroyed, they release stored carbon, accelerating climate change and making coastal communities more vulnerable to storms and rising sea levels.
The destruction of forests and wetlands is a double-edged sword. Not only does it eliminate nature’s ability to absorb CO₂, but it also turns these ecosystems into carbon sources.
Deforestation accounts for 10-15% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Wetlands are disappearing three times faster than forests, with many converted into farmland or drained for infrastructure.
If this trend continues, we could see more extreme weather events, reduced biodiversity, and significant disruptions to water cycles.
The good news? Around the world, governments, communities, and conservation groups are taking action to restore these crucial ecosystems.
Denmark has pledged to plant one billion trees and convert 10% of its farmland into forests over the next 20 years.
Indonesia has launched a massive initiative to restore 3.3 million hectares of mangroves by 2045.
Uganda is helping wetland-dependent communities transition to sustainable livelihoods like beekeeping instead of draining wetlands for farming.
Benin is using traditional voodoo practices to protect sacred mangroves, successfully restoring hundreds of hectares.
Meanwhile, some cities are turning to urban reforestation to combat rising temperatures and poor air quality. In places like Los Angeles and Singapore, tree-planting campaigns are cooling urban environments, reducing energy costs, and improving overall air quality.
Restoring forests and wetlands isn’t just about fighting climate change—it’s also one of the most cost-effective ways to do so. Unlike expensive carbon capture technology, nature-based solutions require minimal investment but yield long-term benefits for people, wildlife, and the planet.
Yet, funding for nature-based solutions remains far too low. Less than 3% of global climate financing goes toward forest and wetland conservation, despite their proven effectiveness.
Governments, businesses, and individuals must take action:
Stronger policies to prevent illegal deforestation and wetland destruction.
Corporate responsibility to invest in nature-based carbon offset programs.
Consumer choices that support sustainable products and responsible land use.
Community-led conservation efforts to protect and restore natural habitats.
Imagine a world where forests and wetlands thrive—where carbon is naturally absorbed, extreme weather is less severe, and biodiversity flourishes. That world is still possible, but only if we act now.
As climate change accelerates, we must decide: Do we continue down the path of destruction, or do we prioritize the protection and restoration of nature’s greatest carbon sinks?
The answer should be clear. If nature has given us a way to fight climate change, shouldn’t we do everything in our power to protect it?